Home โ€บ Comparisons โ€บ Feeld vs #Open

Feeld vs #Open: Which is Better for ENM Dating?

Side-by-side comparison for polyamory & ethical non-monogamy ยท Updated April 2026

Quick Verdict
Winner: Feeld for most users
Both are built for ENM, but Feeld's larger user base typically makes it the more practical choice. #Open wins on intentional design and less hookup-focused culture.

Side-by-Side Comparison

FeatureFeeld#Open
Designed for ENMโœ“ YesPartial / No
Couple profilesโœ“ SupportedLimited
User densityLarge cities bestAll areas
Free tier valueLimitedMore generous
LGBTQ+ inclusiveVery strongModerate
Privacy featuresIncognito availableStandard
ENM community feelHigh โ€” everyone here is ENM-awareMixed โ€” must filter

When Feeld is the Better Choice

  • You're in or near a major metro area
  • You want a community that already speaks ENM fluently โ€” no explaining needed
  • Queer, kinky, or non-binary identity is part of your experience
  • You have a partner to link profiles with
  • Community quality matters more than raw quantity of profiles

When #Open is the Better Choice

  • You live outside major metro areas
  • You're newer to ENM and want exposure to a bigger dating pool
  • Budget is a real constraint โ€” better free tier
  • You want to cast a wider net before narrowing
  • Match volume matters right now over community specificity

The Honest Recommendation

Most serious ENM daters use both. Download both free versions, use each for 2 weeks, and only pay for the one that's showing real results in your specific location. "Best" is always the app with the most active compatible users where you actually live.
See All ENM App Reviews โ†’ ENM Profile Tips โ†’

Related Guides

ENM by CityFind the best app for your cityRead โ†’
ENM Profile TipsWrite a profile that worksRead โ†’
What is ENM?Beginner's guide to ethical non-monogamyRead โ†’

What Real ENM Daters Say

We collected feedback from polyamorous daters across multiple US cities about their experiences comparing these platforms. The pattern that emerged was consistent: no single app wins universally. The "better" app depends almost entirely on where you live and what you're looking for.

Daters in major metro areas (NYC, SF, LA, Chicago) consistently reported better results with ENM-dedicated apps due to critical mass of users. Daters in medium-sized cities and suburban areas almost always reported OKCupid as more practical simply because the user pool was large enough to find compatible people.

One pattern worth noting: many successful ENM daters reported using two apps simultaneously for the first 60โ€“90 days, then dropping the one with worse results in their specific area. This "parallel testing" approach, while requiring more time investment upfront, significantly outperformed committing to a single app.

Cost Comparison Over 3 Months

ScenarioMonthly Cost3-Month Total
Both apps, free tiers only$0$0
One app premium, one free$10โ€“$15$30โ€“$45
Both apps, both premium$20โ€“$45$60โ€“$135

Our recommendation: start with both free tiers. Upgrade only the app that's showing real results after 3โ€“4 weeks.

Final Verdict: Which Should You Download First?

If you live in a major city (NYC, LA, SF, Chicago, Seattle, Portland, Denver, Austin): Download the ENM-dedicated app first. The community density in these cities makes it worth prioritizing.

If you live anywhere else: Start with OKCupid for the user base, and add the ENM-specific app as a secondary option. The ENM-dedicated apps tend to have very sparse user bases outside major metros.

If you're new to ENM: OKCupid's larger, more mixed pool and gentler learning curve makes it the better starting point. Read our beginner's guide before you start.

If you're experienced: You likely already know your community's preferred platform. Trust that local knowledge over any general recommendation.